Legal Opinion

McFetridge v. Chiado

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 21, 1982No. Docket 55581PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff commenced the present paternity action over ten years after the birth of her child. Defendant moved for accelerated judgment based upon the six-year limitation period contained within the paternity statute. MCL 722.714(b); MSA 25.494(b). Plaintiff countered by arguing that the limitation period violates the Equal Protection Clauses of the United States Constitution, US Const, Am XIV, and the Michigan Constitution, Const 1963, art 1, § 2. The trial court agreed that the statute precluded plaintiffs paternity claim but ruled nonetheless that a declaratory judgment action could be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lalli v. LalliSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. J. M. S. Ex Rel. Webb v. BensonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. People ex rel. Pangborn v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Daniel v. CollierMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Spada v. PauleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Frazier v. CastellaniMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Pizana v. JonesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Shifter v. WolfMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Spada v. PauleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API