Legal Opinion

Buckwalter v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 31, 1932No. 5988PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKENLOOPER, Circuit Judge.

The petitioner is one of the vice presidents of the Timken Roller Bearing Company and complains that in the assessment of his personal ineome tax for the years 1924 and 1925 he was denied a deduction for the exhaustion of two patents owned by him and susceptible to valuation as of March 1, 1913, but which had not been exploited in any way, as by the granting of licenses or the prosecution of suits against infringers. One of these patents covered a special design of truck for use in creosoting railroad ties, and the other a roller bearing assembly for the axles of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Refling v. BurnetCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  2. Owens v. BattenfieldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
  3. Ames v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. P. Dougherty Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1946
  2. Kittredge v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  3. Yellow Cab Co. of Pittsburgh v. DriscollDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API