Legal Opinion
Yellow Cab Co. of Pittsburgh v. Driscoll
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 30, 1938No. 8925PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McVICAR, District Judge.
This is an action to recover the sum of $1,170.28, with interest thereon from March 10, 1937, which amount represents income and excess profits taxes with interest thereon, which was paid by plaintiff to the defendant, Collector of Internal Revenue, on the above date. Jury trial was waived. The Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law :
Findings of Fact.
1. The Court finds the facts as contained in the Stipulation of Facts of the parties hereto, which is filed herewith and which, by reference, is made a part hereof.
2. Plaintiff stored in its…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. LudeySupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Kittredge v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- Hardwick Realty Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- Buckwalter v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
- Independent Brick Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928
3Cited by17 opinions
- Norfolk Southern Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1995
- P. Dougherty Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1946
- Alamo Broadcasting Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1950
- Steen v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1973
- The Union Central Life Insurance Company, Cross-Appellant v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.