Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Dye v. Diamante, a Private Membership Golf Club

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 16, 2017No. CV-16-455Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partCourtney Hudson Goodson, Justice

I agree with the majority’s decision to reverse and dismiss the circuit court’s April |fi14, 2016 order based on a lack of jurisdiction, and I therefore concur with that portion of the opinion. However, I must respectfully dissent from the decision to recall our mandate awarding appellate costs to appellee.

This appeal stems from this court’s opinion in case number CV-14-618 reversing and remanding the circuit court’s order denying appellee’s motion to compel arbitration against unnamed class members. Diamante, LLC v. Dye, 2015 Ark. 243, 464 S.W.3d 459. In that opinion, we instructed the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nooner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  2. Ward v. State.3Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
  3. Wertz v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
  4. Diamante, LLC v. DyeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API