Legal Opinion

Tyler Construction Group v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided June 25, 2009No. 2008-5177PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIEDMAN, Circuit Judge.

The principal issue is whether the United States Army Corps of Engineers (“the Corps”) was authorized to use so-called Indefinite Deliver/Indefinite Quantity Contracts (known as “IDIQ contracts”) for the design and construction of military buildings (barracks and related structures) in an eight-state area in the southeastern United States. As the name implies, those contracts did not state the number of such structures to be built or the dates for construction, but did specify the total dollar range the construction would involve. The Court of Federal Claims held that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. E.W. Bliss Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  2. Lockheed Missiles & Space Co., Inc. v. Lloyd Bentsen, Secretary of the Treasury, and at & T Federal Systems, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  3. Tyler Constr. Group v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Res-Care, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
  2. Management & Training Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  3. Geo-Med, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  4. American Auto Logistics, Lp v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  5. Metropolitan Van & Storage, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API