Legal Opinion

Baker Ice Mach. Co. v. Hebert

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 14, 1935No. 10092PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Circuit Judge.

The appellee, as plaintiff below, brought this action to recover on certain promissory notes amounting in the aggregate to approximately $7,000. The execution of the notes and their nonpayment was admitted by defendant, but it asked a set-off by virtue of an alleged guarantee of payment of certain accounts purchased by it with other property of plaintiff’s testate, and for which certain promissory notes were then given, the notes in question being renewals of those originally given. The total accounts so claimed to have been guaranteed amount in 'the aggregate to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Fleischmann Construction Co. v. United States Ex Rel. ForsbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Norris v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  3. Martinton v. FairbanksSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Humphreys v. Third Nat. Bank of CincinnatiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
  5. United States v. PerryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. BowmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  2. Harris v. BiszkowiczCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
  3. Fierce v. WyattCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API