Legal Opinion

Fierce v. Wyatt

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 6, 1936No. 10437PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANBORN, Circuit Judge.

This is an action at law upon a promissory note. The appellants were plaintiffs in the court below. The defendants were the makers of the note. A. J. Shoultz, one of the defendants, filed an answer alleging that the note in suit was executed for the purpose of renewing a note which was about to mature, but that the latter note, instead of being renewed, was paid in full. The case was, by stipulation of the parties, tried to the court without a jury. At the close of the evidence, the answering defendant moved for judgment in his favor. The plaintiffs made no motion for…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Fleischmann Construction Co. v. United States Ex Rel. ForsbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Lewellyn v. Electric Reduction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Martinton v. FairbanksSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Wilson v. Merchants' Loan & Trust Co. of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  5. Humphreys v. Third Nat. Bank of CincinnatiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alliance Life Ins. v. SalibaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
  2. Becher v. SidnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API