In re Thomas
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
Claimant concedes that the Commission’s findings, material to our decision, are supported by competent evidence in the record. With the exception of the conclusion that claimant is not available for work within the meaning of the law, the findings and conclusions of the Commission will support an order that claimant is eligible for benefits from 4 November 1970 through 19 January 1971. Thus, the one question presented on this appeal is whether the conclusion made by the Commission that claimant is not available for work within the meaning of the law is supported by the findings…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Krauss v. A. & M. KARAGHEUSIAN, INC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- In re the Claim of BourneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
3Cited by2 opinions
- London v. Board of Review of the W. Va. Dept. of Employment SecurityWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
- London v. BD. OF REVIEW OF DEPT. OF EMPLOYMENTWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978