Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Bevans

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 18, 1937No. Crim. 411PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

Defendant was charged with violation of the provisions of section 288 of the Penal Code and also with violation of the provisions of the Juvenile Court Law. The other person involved was a girl of the age of eight years. He was convicted and sentences were pronounced upon him on both counts. He has appealed from the judgments and the order denying his motion for new trial.

Defendant presents but a single ground for a reversal of the judgments and order. He was sentenced on the same day during the same hearing. The judgment on the verdict finding him guilty of violating the provisions of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. ColtrinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. People v. DegnenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  3. In Re Application of O'ConnorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. People v. KerrickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. People v. MehraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. GreerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. People v. KrupaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. People v. DarcyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. People v. DerenzoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. People v. TennerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API