General Motors Corp. v. Oklahoma County Board of Equalization
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion
SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION ON REHEARING
2Per curiam
We hereby supplement the opinion .of this Court of May 17, 1983 (54 O.B.J. 1351) as amended by Order of July 26, 1983 (54 O.B.J. 2068) by adding thereto the following:
A further review of Lemon v. Kurtzman, 411 U.S. 192, 93 S.Ct. 1463, 36 L.Ed.2d 151 (1973) impels the conclusion that the rule of Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425, 6 S.Ct. 1121, 30 L.Ed. 178 (1886) (that an unconstitutional statute “confers no rights; it imposes no duties; it affords no protection; it creates no office; it is, in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been…
3Cases cited15 opinions
- Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State Ex Rel. v. Board of County Com'rsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- La Bellman v. Gleason & Sanders, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.