Legal Opinion

Bruder v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1968No. 41138PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Appellant’s contention, that Rule 1.04 (d) of the Rules and Regulations of the Public Utilities Commission is invalid on the ground that it violates Section 16 of Article I of the Ohio Constitution and the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution is without merit.

Upon consideration of the record, this court holds that the order of the commission denying applicant’s application *25is neither unreasonable nor unlawful. Section 4903.13, Revised Code; H. & K. Motor Transportation, Inc., v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1939), 135 Ohio St. 145, 19 N. E. 2d 956; Jones v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1943), 141…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. H. & K. Motor Transportation, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Jones v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bertolini v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API