Bruder v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Appellant’s contention, that Rule 1.04 (d) of the Rules and Regulations of the Public Utilities Commission is invalid on the ground that it violates Section 16 of Article I of the Ohio Constitution and the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution is without merit.
Upon consideration of the record, this court holds that the order of the commission denying applicant’s application *25is neither unreasonable nor unlawful. Section 4903.13, Revised Code; H. & K. Motor Transportation, Inc., v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1939), 135 Ohio St. 145, 19 N. E. 2d 956; Jones v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1943), 141…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- H. & K. Motor Transportation, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1939
- Jones v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1943
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bertolini v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1974