Legal Opinion

Wilbur v. Gross

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided January 20, 1936PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoss, J.

This is an action of trespass for injuries sustained by the plaintiff when bitten by a dog harbored by the defendant. There was no proof of scienter and on that ground the defendant, at the close of the testimony, made a motion that a verdict be directed in his favor. This motion was denied by the trial court and his exception noted. The jury returned a verdict of $1,000 in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant thereafter duly moved for a new trial on the grounds that the verdict was.against the law, that it was against the evidence, and that the damages were excessive. The trial justice…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smith v. WilliamsMontana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Swift v. AppleboneMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Miller v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Porter v. AldrichSupreme Court of Vermont · 1866
  5. Dudley v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Vermont · 1882

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Johnston v. PoulinSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
  2. Lamoureux v. DavisSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1986
  3. Jaime Carreiro v. David Tobin, AliasSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2013
  4. Vukic v. BrunelleSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1992
  5. Bernhart v. NineSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API