Legal Opinion
Rome Electric Inc. v. Railway Express Agency
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided April 7, 1950No. 32817PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWorrill, J.
The plaintiff in error concedes that it is impossible to say or prove whose negligent act caused the damage to the radio-phonograph, and bases its case upon the holdings in Breed v. Mitchell, 48 Ga. 533 (3), Paramore v. Western R. Co., 53 Ga. 383, Savannah &c. Ry. v. Hoffmayer, 75 Ga. 410, Henry v. Central R. & Banking Co., 89 Ga. 815 (15 S. E. 757), Ohlen v. A. & W. P. R. Co., 2 Ga. App. 323 (58 S. E. 511), and Georgia Fla. & Ala. Ry. Co. v. Stanton & Co., 5 Ga. App. 500 (63 S. E. 655). We have considered each of these cases and the rulings in them all seem to be based ultimately on the rule…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Exposition Cotton MillsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
- Ohlen v. Atlanta & West Point RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Hartwell Railway Co. v. KiddCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
- Evans & Ragland v. Atlanta & West Point RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
- Acme Fast Freight Inc. v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Empire Aluminum Corporation v. SS KORENDIJKDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1973
- Loo-Mac Freight Lines, Inc. v. American Type Founders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- Railway Express Agency Inc. v. L. E. Parker Fish Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Railway Express Agency Inc. v. Southern Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1951