Legal Opinion

Loo-Mac Freight Lines, Inc. v. American Type Founders, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 17, 1959No. 37878PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Townsend, Judge.

The plaintiff in error does not insist on the general grounds of the motion for new trial, and assigns error on certain charges of the court which, it is contended, were improper in that they deprived the defendant of his defense that the cargo was injured through inherent vice in that it was improperly crated by the shipper, a defect latent and not apparent to the carrier, and that this was the cause of the injury. We agree with the plaintiff in error that the burden is on the plaintiff in the first instance to show that the damage occurred in transit by showing that the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Central Railroad v. HasselkusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  2. Richmond & Danville Railroad v. White & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  3. Atlanta and West Point Railroad v. Jacobs' Pharmacy Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  4. Southern Express Co. v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  5. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Clark Milling Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1929

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad v. Freight Delivery Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  2. Empire Aluminum Corporation v. SS KORENDIJKDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1973
  3. Thurston Motor Lines, Inc. v. CorryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  4. Modern Wholesale Florist v. Braniff International Airways, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API