Artco-Bell Corp. v. City of Temple
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Justice.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment. Plaintiff in the trial court was Art-co-Bell Corporation (Artco-Bell) and defendant was the City of Temple, Texas (City). The trial court granted City’s motion for summary judgment which alleged that Artco-Bell’s notice of claim to the City was not “duly verified” as required by the City Charter and that the City was not given written notice of the alleged dangerous condition giving rise to the loss in question ten days prior to the accident in question. The court of civil appeals affirmed. 603 S.W.2d 384. We reverse the judgment of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Texas Department of Corrections v. HerringTexas Supreme Court · 1974
- Lower Colorado River Authority v. City of San MarcosTexas Supreme Court · 1975
- Satterfield v. SatterfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1969
- Forwood v. City of TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1948
- Hanks v. City of Port ArthurTexas Supreme Court · 1932
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- City of Houston v. TorresTexas Supreme Court · 1981
- City of Austin v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2014
- Colquitt v. Brazoria CountyTexas Supreme Court · 2010
- Dallas County v. Coskey, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
- Ballesteros v. Nueces County, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2009
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.