Legal Opinion

Artco-Bell Corp. v. City of Temple

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1981No. B-9810PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE, Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment. Plaintiff in the trial court was Art-co-Bell Corporation (Artco-Bell) and defendant was the City of Temple, Texas (City). The trial court granted City’s motion for summary judgment which alleged that Artco-Bell’s notice of claim to the City was not “duly verified” as required by the City Charter and that the City was not given written notice of the alleged dangerous condition giving rise to the loss in question ten days prior to the accident in question. The court of civil appeals affirmed. 603 S.W.2d 384. We reverse the judgment of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Corrections v. HerringTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Lower Colorado River Authority v. City of San MarcosTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Satterfield v. SatterfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Forwood v. City of TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Hanks v. City of Port ArthurTexas Supreme Court · 1932

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. TorresTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  2. City of Austin v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2014
  3. Colquitt v. Brazoria CountyTexas Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Dallas County v. Coskey, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
  5. Ballesteros v. Nueces County, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2009

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API