Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

People v. Kornegay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 20, 1977Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Herlihy, J. (concurring in part and dissenting in part).

Unlike the situation in People v Ranellucci (53 AD2d 384) and People v Hankins (52 AD2d 470) the defendant never made any effort to obtain a speedy trial and he has asserted no prejudice. Under such circumstances the negligence of the State in securing a speedy trial did not result in a violation of his constitutional rights (see People v Ranellucci, supra; People v Taranovich, 37 NY2d 442).

However, the majority proposes to reduce the sentence because the People would so consent and in fact have urged a reduction. The sentence was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. TaranovichNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. RanellucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  3. People v. HankinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API