Legal Opinion
Kennard v. Reliance, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided May 4, 1970No. [No. 214, September Term, 1969.]PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
We here consider the interrelationship between the provisions of subtitle 3 of the Uniform Commercial Code, Code (1964 Repl. Vol.), Art. 95B (UCC), and the Maryland Retail Installment Sales Act, Code (1957, 1969 Repl. Vol.), Art. 83, §§ 128-153, with particular reference to § 147 of the Retail Installment Sales Act which provides in pertinent part:
“If, as part of an installment transaction, a note is taken by the seller * * *, such note shall refer to the installment agreement out of which it arises and, in the hands of any subsequent holder, such note shall be subject to all defenses which…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Unico v. OwenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
- 1ST NAT. BK. of MILLVILLE v. HorwattSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Casey v. Philadelphia Auto Sales Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Stride v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
- Jones v. Approved Bancredit Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Block v. Ford Motor Credit CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985