Primus v. City of Hot Springs
New Mexico Supreme Court
1DissentLujan, Justice
A careful and exhaustive examination of the record convinces me that the plaintiff failed to establish any causal connection between the defendant’s, City of Hot Springs, alleged negligence and the injury and subsequent death of the deceased. Since proximate cause cannot be presumed from the mere happening of the accident, but like any other essential element, must be established in some manner, either by direct or circumstantial evidence, and since the plaintiff wholly failed to meet the essential requirements, the trial court properly dismissed plaintiff’s complaint. Transgard v. Atchison,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pentecost v. HudsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
- In Re Estate of MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Heron v. GaylorNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
- Navajo Live Stock & Trading Co. v. Gallup State BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1920
- Transgard v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1918