Legal Opinion
Pentecost v. Hudson
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided January 13, 1953No. 5391PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUJAN, Justice.
This suit was instituted in the District Court of Eddy County by James M. Pentecost against Mildred Crane Hudson seeking to establish an unrecorded, undivided royalty interest in Lot 1 (NE14 NEJ4) of Section 2, Township 18 South, Range 27 East, under an oil and gas lease executed by the State of New Mexico to Fred Brain-ard.
The plaintiff's complaint among other things alleged in substance that on October 14, 1941, Fred Brainard executed and delivered to plaintiff an assignment of an undivided royalty interest equal to 1% of % of all the oil and gas produced, saved and marketed;…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re Estate of MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Cunningham v. SpringerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1905
- Heron v. GaylorNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
- Navajo Live Stock & Trading Co. v. Gallup State BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1920
- Transgard v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Terrel v. Duke City Lumber Company, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
- Fitzgerald v. FitzgeraldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Hales v. Van CleaveNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1967
- Falkner v. MartinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
- Hummer v. BetenboughNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.