Legal Opinion

Steckel & Son v. Standley

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 15, 1898PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Davis District Court.- — I-Ion. M. A. Roberts, Judge. Action in equity to recover the amount due on a promissory note and other demands, and for the foreclosure of a mortgage. There was a hearing on the'merits, and a decree from which the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

The record discloses the following facts: In March, 1888, one Stephenson owned a farm in Davis county, and in that month executed thereon a mortgage to Mary E. McChesney to secure the payment of a promissory note for one thousand dollars, which matured January 1, 1893,. In October, 1891, the farm was purchased by Charles *696B. Parkinson; and in March, 1892, he executed a mortgage thereon to Amos Steckel, as trustee, to secure the payment of a promissory note of Parkinson to Barbara Steckel for one thousand one hundred dollars, which became due February 1, 1895. In February, 1894, Parkinson…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hills v. Exchange BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Westlake & Button v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1882
  3. Girard v. St. Louis Car Wheel Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  4. Hall v. Norwalk Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1888
  5. Clapp v. GreenleeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sherwood v. Greater Mammoth Vein Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  2. West v. Averill Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  3. Hirsh v. Ogden Furniture & Carpet Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Steckel v. SelixSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API