Legal Opinion

Ernst v. McDowell

Cuyahoga Circuit Court

Decided November 27, 1911PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarvin, J.

The parties to this action, Ernst and McDowell, entered into a written agreement on the 6th day of April, 1909, which agreement reads as follows:

“Cleveland, 0., April 6th, 1909-
“We, William McDowell and B, W. Ernst, both jointly and separately hereby agree that in view of a misunderstanding and disagreement in regard to a certain contract for work done at Upper Sandusky, said contract for work having been done by B. W. Ernst, who did not complete the same, William McDowell doing the unfinished portion of the work for B. W. Ernst and completing said work in accordance with the plans and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wallis v. CarpenterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1866

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gerl Construction Co. v. Medina County Board of CommissionersOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. King v. Sentry Claims ServiceOhio Court of Appeals · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API