Legal Opinion · Dissent

King v. Sentry Claims Service

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 26, 1991No. 59900Published

1DissentDavid T. Matia, Presiding Judge

I respectfully dissent from the opinion of the majority. In the case sub judice, defendant-appellee Sentry Claims Services (“Sentry”) alleged partiality or corruption on the part of arbitrator Howard A. Schulman as a result of an alleged prior attorney-client relationship that had existed between the plaintiffs-appellants and Schulman. Sentry, in its motion to vacate the arbitration award, alleged that Schulman had previously filed a lawsuit on behalf of the appellants against the Lakewood Board of Education for injuries suffered prior to the motor vehicle accident which formed the basis of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. San Luis Obispo Bay Properties, Inc. v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. R. E. Bean Construction Co. v. Middlebury Associates & Middlebury Developers, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1980
  3. Freeport Construction Co. v. Star Forge, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  4. In Re the Arbitration Between Cross Properties, Inc. & Gimbel Bros.New York Court of Appeals · 1962
  5. In re the Arbitration between Cross Properties, Inc. & Gimbel Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API