Legal Opinion

Jones v. Vanzandt

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio

Decided July 15, 1843No. Case No. 7,502PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT. This is a motion for a new trial, and, also, in arrest of judgment. The jury found for the plaintiff twelve hundred dollars, in damages, on' the third and fourth counts of the declaration. [Case No. 7,501.]

The first ground on which a new trial is asked, is, “that a peremptory challenge was allowed the plaintiff, after he expressed himself satisfied with the jury, and after two peremptory challenges had been made by the defendant” The statute gives a right to each party to challenge, peremptorily, two jurors. There was some difference of opinion among the members of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rockfeller v. DonnellyCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1826
  2. President of the Union Turnpike Road v. JenkinsNew York Supreme Court · 1803
  3. President of the Highland Turnpike v. M'KeanNew York Supreme Court · 1814
  4. Executors of Van Rensselaer v. Executors of PlatnerNew York Supreme Court · 1800
  5. Allen v. AddingtonNew York Supreme Court · 1834

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Crocker v. HoffmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Street v. TreadwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  3. United States v. MorrisDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1903
  4. Izumi v. Kwan Doo ParkHawaii Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Reed v. ThayerIndiana Supreme Court · 1857

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API