Jones v. Vanzandt
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT. This is a motion for a new trial, and, also, in arrest of judgment. The jury found for the plaintiff twelve hundred dollars, in damages, on' the third and fourth counts of the declaration. [Case No. 7,501.]
The first ground on which a new trial is asked, is, “that a peremptory challenge was allowed the plaintiff, after he expressed himself satisfied with the jury, and after two peremptory challenges had been made by the defendant” The statute gives a right to each party to challenge, peremptorily, two jurors. There was some difference of opinion among the members of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rockfeller v. DonnellyCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1826
- President of the Union Turnpike Road v. JenkinsNew York Supreme Court · 1803
- President of the Highland Turnpike v. M'KeanNew York Supreme Court · 1814
- Executors of Van Rensselaer v. Executors of PlatnerNew York Supreme Court · 1800
- Allen v. AddingtonNew York Supreme Court · 1834
3Cited by6 opinions
- Crocker v. HoffmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Street v. TreadwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- United States v. MorrisDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1903
- Izumi v. Kwan Doo ParkHawaii Supreme Court · 1960
- Reed v. ThayerIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.