Howse & Holloman v. Judson
Supreme Court of Florida
This case was brought up, by. writ of error, sued out by William Forbes, to Gadsden Circuit Court; defendants in error moved to dismiss the case upon the ground-that plaintiffs in error, have not authorized the institution of the suit, and that the writ of error Was prayed for and is now prosecuted without their privity or consent. The opinion of the Court contains the facts as agreed 'to by counsel. '
1Opinion of the Court
Douglas, Chief Justice: .
This case comes before-us, upon a motion made by the counsel for the defendants in error to dismiss it, upon the ground that the *134plaintiffs in error have not authorised the institution of the suit; and that the writ of error was prayed for, and is now prosecuted, without their privity or consent.
The motion is based upon the following statement of facts, which has been agreed to by the counsel for the defendants in error, and the counsel of William Forbes, who prosecutes this writ of error, and which is of file with the papers of this cause, viz :
“ Judson & Co.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Barr v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1808
3Cited by6 opinions
- McIntyre v. SholtyIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
- King v. BrownSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
- Ladd v. KuhnIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
- Shuford v. . CookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Guaranty Title & Trust Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.