Legal Opinion
Nottingham v. Ackiss
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided June 13, 1907PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Error to a judgment of the Law and Equity Court of the city of Norfolk in an action of debt. Judgment for the plaintiff. Defendants assign error.
1Opinion of the CourtBuchanan, J.
On the 2nd day of July, 1905, the plaintiff in error and O. E. I). Barron made their promissory note, payable to the assignor of the defendant in error, of which the following is a copy:
“Norfolk, Va., July 2nd, 1905.
“790.00,
“On demand, We promise to pay to the order of Charles E. Ilodgman negotiable and payable, without offset, at Seaboard Bank, Incorporated, of Norfolk, Virginia, Seven hundred and' ninety .... Dollars, for value received, with costs of collection or any attorney’s fees, if incurred, in case payment shall not be made at maturity; and we, the maker or makers, endorser or…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kenyon v. KnipeWashington Supreme Court · 1890
- Price v. KyleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1852
- Peyton v. HarmanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1872
- Carter v. NolandSupreme Court of Virginia · 1890
- Newell v. MayberrySupreme Court of Virginia · 1831
3Cited by2 opinions
- Meijer v. ThompsonDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009
- Nottingham v. AckissSupreme Court of Virginia · 1910