Legal Opinion

Meijer v. Thompson

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided September 4, 2009No. 1:08cv673 (LMB/TRJ)Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LEONIE M. BRINKEMA, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Elze T. Meijer and Marcel Windt, in their capacity as bankruptcy trustees, have brought this action against defendant H. Brian Thompson, seeking collection of a promissory note. Before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment and the plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss the defendant’s indemnity counterclaim and corresponding defenses. For the reasons discussed below, plaintiffs’ motions will be granted, defendant’s motion will be denied, and judgment will be entered in the plaintiffs’ favor.

I. Background

A. The Note.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API