Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Beacon Journal Publishing Co. v. Radel

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1991No. 90-1018PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

This case presents serious factual and legal issues, but the court of appeals did not address them; instead, it summarily granted a peremptory writ of mandamus, giving appellants no chance to challenge Beacon Journal’s assertions. We conclude that *103the court of appeals improperly issued the writ.

A court may grant a peremptory writ only in limited circumstances. R.C. 2731.06 provides: “When the right to require the performance of an act is clear and it is apparent that no valid excuse can be given for not doing it, a court, in the first instance, may allow a peremptory mandamus. * * *”

We have…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. National Broadcasting Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State ex rel. Mazzaro v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State ex rel. National Broadcasting Co. v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State ex rel. Beck v. CaseyOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State ex rel. Temke v. OutcaltOhio Supreme Court · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Warren Newspapers, Inc. v. HutsonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. The Warren Newspapers, Inc. v. HutsonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. The State Ex Rel. Doe v. Gallia County Common Pleas Court.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State ex rel. Seballos v. School Employees Retirement SystemOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State ex rel. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co. v. O'Donnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API