Model, Roland & Co. v. Industrial Acoustics Co.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum : Order of the Appellate Division directing judgment for the plaintiff-respondent affirmed. Defendants-appellants are correct in their contention that the provisions of article VIII of the corporate by-laws are ineffective to the extent that they require a two-thirds majority shareholder *705vote to amend certain of the by-laws — in particular the by-law which sets the number of directors on the board. The Business Corporation Law clearly provides that a simple majority vote of the shareholders is sufficient to amend the by-laws, unless the certificate of incorporation provides…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Joseph Polchinski Co. v. Cemetery Floral Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Roach v. BynumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Rye Psychiatric Hospital Center, Inc. v. SchoenholtzNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Stile v. AnticoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Dubin v. MuchnickNew York Supreme Court · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.