Ortiz v. Geneva Rock Products, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILKINS, Associate Presiding Judge.
Louis Ortiz challenges the jury’s verdict of no cause of action by arguing the evidence does not support it. We agree and accordingly reverse and remand for a new trial.
BACKGROUND
In reviewing a jury verdict, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to it, see Rees v. Intermountain Health Care, Inc., 808 P.2d 1069, 1073 (Utah 1991), and recite the facts accordingly. We “present conflicting evidence only to the extent necessary to understand the issues raised on appeal.” State v. Dunn, 850 P.2d 1201, 1206 (Utah 1993).
On June 4, 1991, Ortiz was…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. DunnUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. EmmettUtah Supreme Court · 1992
- Billings v. Union Bankers Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1996
- Bambrough v. BethersUtah Supreme Court · 1976
- Wessel v. Erickson Landscaping Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ross v. Epic Engineering, PCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
- Townhomes At Pointe Meadows Owners Ass'n. v. Pointe Meadows Townhomes, LLCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
- Lawrence v. Mountainstar HealthcareCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
- Holmstrom v. C.R. England, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2000
- Avalos v. TL Custom, LLCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.