Sheppard v. Miss. State Highway Patrol
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
693 So.2d 1326 (1997)
Mitchell E. SHEPPARD, Jr.
v.
MISSISSIPPI STATE HIGHWAY PATROL, Jim Ingram, Director, Lt. Wayne Parker, Supervisor, Driver Improvement Branch, Mississippi State Highway Patrol and the Attorney General of the State of Mississippi, Mike Moore.
No. 93-CA-00117-SCT.
Supreme Court of Mississippi.
May 15, 1997.
V.W. Carmody, Jr., Stanfield Carmody & Clark, Jackson, for Appellant.
John K. Bramlett, Jr., Brandon, for Appellee.
Before PRATHER, P.J., and JAMES L. ROBERTS, Jr. and MILLS, JJ.
MILLS, Justice, for the Court:
This case compels us to construe our implied consent law under D.U.I.…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Lee; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Lee; Dissent · Sullivan; Dissent · McRAE.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Wetz v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
- Com., Dept. of Transp. v. O'CONNELLSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Omnibank of Mantee v. United Southern BankMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
- Weeks v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Arceo v. TolliverMississippi Supreme Court · 2009
- Askew v. AskewMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
- Rigby v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. ReitterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
- Pickering v. Langston Law Firm, P.A.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2012
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.