Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Dixon

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 1, 1945No. 30848PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPabkee, J.

1. The first grant of a new trial will not be disturbed by the appellate cfturt, unless it appear that the trial judge abused his discretion in granting it, and that the law and facts require the verdict. Code, § 6-1608; Williams v. Rowe, 26 Ga. App. 391 (106 S. E. 299), and cit.

2. Where the plaintiff, in an action of trover for the conversion of lumber cut from timber wrongfully taken from his land, introduces uncontradicted testimony as to the estimated quantity of the timber received by the defendants, and as to the estimated highest market value thereof, such evidence would be sufficient…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Milltown Lumber Co. v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  2. Council v. NunnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  3. Ogletree v. LivingstonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  4. Armour & Co. v. BurkhalterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  5. Purser v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Noles v. Andalusia Casket CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API