Legal Opinion

Harold Butler Enterprises 97, Inc. v. Vanlandingham

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1973PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.

Plaintiff filed this action alleging an unlawful detainer of real property in its first cause of action and alleging unpaid rentals and management fees in its second cause of action. Both actions arise out of a restaurant franchise agreement between the parties. The case was tried before the court without a jury, and a judgment for restitution of the premises and for recovery of management fees was entered in favor of plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

Plaintiff, an Oregon corporation, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Denny’s Restaurants, Inc. Denny’s Restaurants is engaged in franchising individual…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bement v. National Harrow Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Big Top Stores, Inc. v. Ardsley Toy Shoppe, Ltd.New York Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Frink v. McEldowneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Golden West Insulation, Inc. v. Stardust Investment Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  2. King City Realty, Inc. v. Sunpace Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Snohomish County Public Utility District No. 1 v. Broadview Television Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Wedgewood Investment Corp. v. International Harvester Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  5. Lynch Display Corp. v. National Souvenir Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API