Legal Opinion

Commonwealth ex rel. District Attorney v. Gibson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 26, 1934No. Appeal, No. 17PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

By the Act of March 5, 1906, P. L. 63, and its amendments, it is the duty of the county commissioners of the several counties to appoint, for terms of one year, two registrars for each election precinct or ward in cities of the third class. Such appointments are to he made so as to give representation to the two major political parties in the precinct, and for that purpose the act provides, in section two,* that the names of two *431suitable persons “shall be suggested” to the commissioners by petitions filed by the party representatives of the two leading parties of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JamesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  2. Williams's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Commonwealth ex relatione Leslie v. County CommissionersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1835
  4. Hutchinson v. GoshornSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  5. Caffrey v. CaffreySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Mayer v. HemphillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. State Ex Rel. James v. SchorrSupreme Court of Delaware · 1948
  3. State v. SchorrSuperior Court of Delaware · 1948
  4. Zalevsky v. CASILLOSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Bentman v. Seventh Ward Democratic Executive CommitteeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API