Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bentman v. Seventh Ward Democratic Executive Committee

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 22, 1966No. Appeal, No. 359Published

1Dissent

Dissenting. Opinion by

Mr. Justice Cohen:

The majority opinion has held, that our courts have jurisdiction to issue a . writ of mandamus compelling the.reinstatement.ofnn.ousted committeeman of a political. party despite the fact that no. vacancy in that position, exists. In so holding, the majority have overlooked one crucial fact — that -before the outsiders can get in, the insiders must be ordered out. And this, I am, afraid) no court should .ever accomplish by writ of mandamus;. Indeed, plaintiffs themselves have averred that following their removal'from office, two successors were…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Volunteer Firemen's Relief Ass'n v. MinehartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Carroll Township School Board Vacancy CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Commonwealth v. GibbonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Davis v. BlumeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Com. Ex Rel. Dist. Att. v. GibsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API