Legal Opinion

Little v. Smith

District Court, W.D. North Carolina

Decided August 17, 2000No. 3:99CV37-HPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HORN, Chief United States Magistrate Judge.

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the “Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment” (document # 21) and “Brief in Support ... ’’(document # 22), both filed July 17, 2000; and “Plaintiffs Brief in Opposition ...” (document # 24), filed August 7, 2000. On August 16, 2000, the Defendant filed a “Notice of No Reply Brief’ (document # 26).

The parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), and these motions are now ripe for the Court’s determination.

Having carefully considered the parties’ arguments, the…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Parker v. Bladen CountyDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2008
  2. Wiley v. Buncombe CountyDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2012
  3. Oliver v. BaityDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2016
  4. Dorato v. SmithDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
  5. Stockton v. Wake CountyDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2016

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API