Legal Opinion

Brattoli v. Kheel

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided March 11, 1969No. 65-ADM-606PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUDD, District Judge.

OPINION AND FINDINGS

This case, tried without a jury, presents the claim of a longshoreman who was hit in the back of the head and neck by pieces of rigging when the inshore pendant of a cargo boom parted. He charges the vessel, the S. S. Kathryn of Bull Lines, with unseaworthiness and negligence. The vessel in turn seeks indemnity and attorneys’ fees from the longshoreman’s employer, International Terminal Operators Co., Inc. (I.T.O.).

Liability as between the vessel and I. T.O. depends on whether the pendant broke simply because the steel cable forming the pendant had…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Mahnich v. Southern Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Crumady v. the Joachim Hendrik FisserSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Weyerhaeuser Steamship Co. v. Nacirema Operating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Felice Grillea v. United States and National Shipping AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gordon Sandvik v. Alaska Packers Association, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  2. Schroth v. WarnerDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1973
  3. Di Paola v. International Terminal Operating Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
  4. Jackson v. Lloyd Brasileirs Patrimonio NacionalDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1970
  5. Borm v. Cunard Steamship Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API