Legal Opinion
Herschaft v. Bloomberg
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 3, 2003No. 02-9292PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.
Allan Herschaft, pro se, appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion for a preliminary injunction challenging the constitutionality of New York City Administrative Code and Charter § 10-119, which bans the posting of signs on certain city property. Herschaft contends that the ordinance is overbroad, that it chills speech, and it violates the Equal Protection Clause. He sought declaratory, preliminary and permanent injunctive relief, as well as monetary…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bery v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Spencer Tunick v. Howard Safir, in His Official Capacity as the Police Commissioner of the City of New York, and the City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cotz v. MastroeniDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Ritell v. Village of Briarcliff ManorDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Herschaft v. Bloomberg, Mayor of the City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Levy v. Environmental Control BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012