Legal Opinion

Baker v. State

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided November 20, 2009No. 100,501PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Green, J.:

Lynwood Baker filed a pro se motion under K.S.A. 60-1507. The trial court appointed counsel and granted a hearing on his motion. The motion was summarily denied. Baker appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying his K.S.A. .60-1507 motion. On appeal, Baker contends that the trial court erred in dismissing his K.S.A. 60-1507 motion as untimely. We agree. In addition, he contends that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at the hearing on his K.S.A. 60-1507 motion. Because we have previously determined that his K.S.A. 60-1507 motion was timely filed, this issue is moot.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. GraceySupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  2. State v. BakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  3. State v. JeffersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  4. Dunlap v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
  5. Wilkerson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Baker v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  2. Scaife v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2015
  3. Baker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API