Legal Opinion

Ramirez v. Ramirez

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided October 28, 1996No. 16863PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ALARID, Judge.

1. Third-Party Plaintiff, Christina Ramirez (Christina), appeals from the grant of summary judgment to Third-Party Defendant, Vincent Ramirez (Vincent), on the ground that he is not liable under the family purpose doctrine. We affirm.

FACTS

2. The undisputed facts leading up to the incident are as follows: Vincent was accompanied by his brother, Mark Ramirez (Mark), when he rented a Ford Explorer to assist their deceased uncle’s wife, Christina, in her move from Colorado to Abuquerque. A-though the vehicle was rented solely in Vincent’s name, Mark was listed on the rental…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. C & H Construction & Paving Co. v. Citizens BankNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Ledbetter v. WebbNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Fernandez v. Ford Motor Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Board of County Commissioners v. Risk Management DivisionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Eldin v. Farmers Alliance Mutual InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Yates Petroleum Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. State Ex Rel. Children Youth & Families Department v. Kathleen D.C.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State Ex Rel. Children Youth & Families Department v. Kathleen D.C.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API