Legal Opinion

Sampson v. Division of Family Services

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided February 25, 2005No. 337,2004PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACOBS, Justice.

The respondent-below appellant, Danielle Sampson, appeals from an order of the Family Court terminating her parental rights in her biological child, Samuel L. Sampson. Sampson argues that the statute under which her parental rights were terminated is unconstitutional because it deprived her of her constitutional right to due process. That statute, 13 Del. C. § 1103(a)(6), provides in essence that parental rights may be terminated where: (1) a parent’s rights over another child have previously been involuntarily terminated, and (2) termination is in the best interests of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Hercules Inc. v. Leu Trust & Banking (Bahamas) Ltd.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  4. In Re HellerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  5. In Re HanksSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brock v. Department of Services for Children, Youth, and their FamiliesSupreme Court of Delaware · 2022
  2. Division of Family Services v. JamesDelaware Family Court · 2009
  3. George v. DSCYF and DFSSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016
  4. Ralston v. Division of Services for Children, Youth and Their FamiliesSupreme Court of Delaware · 2023
  5. Schnell v. Department of Services for Children, Youth and their FamiliesSupreme Court of Delaware · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API