State v. Gorman
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FONES, Justice.
The sole question on appeal before this Court concerns the effect of oral instructions to the jury made prior to the submission of the written charge. It was error for the trial judge to violate the requirements of T.R.Cr.P. 30(c) in failing to submit “every word” of his charge to the jury in written form. Even though error was committed, T.R.A.P. 36(b) provides that a final judgment will not be set aside unless that error more probably than not affected the judgment. Thus, the scope of our review will be to determine whether this error may be considered harmless.
Defendan…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- McElhaney v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1967
3Cited by17 opinions
- Scott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1996
- State v. RichardsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
- State of Tennessee v. Antonio CrenshawCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2015
- State of Tennessee v. Daniel T. MaupinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2017
- State of Tennessee v. Dylan BrewerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2019
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.