Legal Opinion

Dolid v. Leatherkraft Corp.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 21, 1956PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

39 N.J. Super. 194 (1956)

120 A.2d 617

FANNIE DOLID, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

LEATHERKRAFT CORPORATION, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued February 6, 1956.

Decided February 21, 1956.

Before Judges CLAPP, JAYNE and FRANCIS.

Mr. Max L. Rosenstein argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Milton M. Unger argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Milton M. and Adrian M. Unger, attorneys; Mr. Sam Denstman, on the brief).

The opinion of the court was delivered by JAYNE, J.A.D.

A summarization of the factual circumstances will display the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hartpence v. GrouleffSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  2. Matter of Eldridge v. . Endicott, Johnson Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Camden Trust Co. v. HandleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1942
  4. Schuttler v. ReinhardtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  5. Tinsley v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cestero v. FerraraNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  2. Shilowitz v. ShilowitzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API