Legal Opinion

Bruneau v. W. & W. TRANSPORTATION CO.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 31, 1951PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.

The plaintiff charged the defendants with a conspiracy to deprive him, by false and fraudulent promises and representations, of a truck and to break up his trucking business, and also with a conversion of the truck to their own use. After the plaintiff had rested his case, both defendants rested also and moved for a directed verdict. The court granted their motions. The plaintiff appeals from a denial of his motion to set the verdict aside. In argument and brief the plaintiff waived any claim based upon conspiracy and rested his case entirely upon a claim of conversion by fraud. The only…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Morris v. King Cole Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
  2. Coleman v. FrancisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  3. Basak v. DamutzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  4. Gilbert v. WalkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
  5. Burley v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Alaimo v. RoyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Miller v. ApplebySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  3. Falker v. SamperiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  4. Wallenta v. MoscowitzConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  5. Aviles v. Wayside Auto Body, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API