Howard v. Lee
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Atkinson, Presiding Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) The rulings announced in the first and second head-notes do not require elaboration.
Special ground 4 of the amended motion for a new trial complains of the charge: The petitioner asks “that a certain contract be canceled, that is, the part as to the sale of the land. She alleges and claims that she sold a tractor, but the part of the contract that alleges that she sold the land she asks to be canceled. That is what is known as reformation of a contract.” This instruction was not, as contended, error as being the expression of an…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ingram v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
- Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
3Cited by12 opinions
- McCormick v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Parsons v. GrantCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Hendrix v. PirkleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
- Bruce v. RobertsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
- Cain v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.