Legal Opinion
Bruce v. Roberts
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided October 15, 1963No. 22170PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Justice.
1. In the instant case the defendant Bruce demurred generally and specially to the petition. These demurrers were sustained with leave being given the plaintiff to amend the petition within a specified time. Within the time allotted him the plaintiff amended the petition. No objection was interposed to the amendment and it was duly allowed. From an examination of the original petition and the amendment allowed by the court it becomes apparent that the amendment substantially added to and strengthened the petition, hence was a material amendment. Green v. Spires, 189 Ga. 719,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lefkoff v. SicroSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Woodruff v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Livingston v. BarnettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Verner v. McLartySupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Holliday v. PopeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Southern Railway Co. v. GroganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Purdy v. NorrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Purdy v. NorrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- South Carolina Insurance v. Glennville BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Charles S. Martin Distributing Co. v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.