Legal Opinion
Dulaney Towers Maintenance Corp. v. O'BREY
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided September 5, 1980No. 1527, September Term, 1979PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBowen, J.
The circumstances giving rise to this appeal are quite simple. The appellees purchased a unit in a condominium regime known as the Dulaney Towers Townhouse Condominium No. 2 (hereinafter called Dulaney) on or about May 10, 1976. When they moved in, they kept and maintained a poodle in their unit. On October 1, 1976, the board of directors of Dulaney adopted numerous rules and regulations, among them being Para. E-2 as follows:
One dog or one cat may be kept by the unit owner or occupant, but shall not be kept, bred, or used therein for any commercial purpose. The present pet population is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sterling Village Condominium, Inc. v. BreitenbachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
- Johnson v. KeithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Justice Court Mutual Housing Cooperative, Inc. v. SandowNew York Supreme Court · 1966
- Riverbay Corp. v. KlinghofferAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
- Kingsview Homes, Inc. v. JarvisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
3Cited by17 opinions
- Nahrstedt v. Lakeside Village Condominium Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Wolinsky v. KadisonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- Garfink v. Cloisters at Charles, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Ridgely Condominium Ass'n v. SmyrnioudisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Board of Directors of 175 East Delaware Place Homeowners Ass'n v. HinojosaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.