Legal Opinion
Lavergne v. Bryson
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 20, 2012No. 12-1171PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Eugene Martin LaVergne, proceeding pro se,1 appeals an order of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey denying his request to convene a three judge panel under 28 U.S.C. § 2284 and dismissing his complaint. We summarily affirm. See 3d Cir. L.A.R. 27.4; 3d Cir. I.O.P. 10.6.
I
LaVergne, a New Jersey citizen and registered voter, alleges in this suit that the method of congressional apportionment under 2 U.S.C. § 2a is unconstitutional. LaVergne asserts that the method violates (1) separation of powers, (2) the nondelegation doctrine, (3) the principle of “one…
3Cases cited19 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Raines v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Freytag v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- Lavergne v. U.S. House of RepresentativesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Eugene Lavergne v. United States House of RepresentativesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021
- Lavergne v. United States House of RepresentativesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Lavergne v. United States House of RepresentativesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019