Legal Opinion

Lavergne v. United States House of Representatives

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 6, 2018No. Civil Action No. 2017-0793Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA EUGENE MARTIN LAVERGNE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 17-793 (CKK-CP-RDM) UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Eugene Martin LaVergne (“LaVergne”) and four co-plaintiffs bring this action, proceeding pro se, alleging that a constitutional amendment that was proposed in 1789 was, unbeknownst to most, ratified over 225 years ago. That amendment, they further allege, worked a dramatic change to the structure of our government by requiring that the House of Representatives…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Raines v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API