Legal Opinion

Commercial Bank of Danville v. Burgwyn

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1895PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Civil ACTION, tried before Shuford, J., and a jury, at September Term, 1893, of YaNCe Superior Court. There was judgment for the plaintiff, and defendant appealed. The facts appear in the report of a former appeal (110 N. C.,' 267) and in the opinion of Associate Justice MONTGOMERY.

1Opinion of the Court

MONTGOMERY, J.:

After hearing thorough argument and making a painstaking examination of the pleadings and the testimony, we are unable to discover any material difference in any aspect, between the case presented at this Term of the Court and the one heard and determined at February Term, 1892, and reported in 110 N. C., 267. The opinion delivered in that case, for the Court, by Justice Shepherd, renders it unnecessary for us to go over the ground again. It is true, however, that when the case was last tried at Yance Superior Court objection was made (for the first time) by the defendant to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commercial Bank v. BurgwynSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  2. Carroll v. . HodgesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Watkins v. Kaolin Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  2. Morgan v. . Fraternal AssociationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  3. Gulf States Steel Co. v. FordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  4. Morgan v. . Fraternal AssociationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API