Legal Opinion

Klagsbrun v. Va'ad Harabonim of Greater Monsey

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided June 14, 1999No. CIV. A. 97-3134PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ACKERMAN, District Judge.

This matter comes before the court on defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(2) for lack of personal jurisdiction, or in the alternative, for failure to state a eause of action pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6). The defendants joining in this motion áre the Va'ad Harabonim of Great Monsey (“Va'ad”), Moses Tendler, Berel Wein, Avrohom Pessin, Hirsch Chapler, and Alfred Cohen. 1

For .the reasons discussed more fully below, this court will consider the defendants’ motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) for…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Mortensen v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  3. Lynch v. DonnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Watson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  5. Serbian Eastern Orthodox Diocese for United States and Canada v. MilivojevichSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Westbrook v. PenleyTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Kavanagh v. ZwillingDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  3. Sands v. Living Word FellowshipAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Hartwig v. Albertus Magnus CollegeDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2000
  5. Connor v. Archdiocese of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API